The technology that I
consider to have influenced education most in my content area, art, is the
introduction of the slate board and chalk. After viewing the first video I
immediately connected this to my methods course where I learned that Walter Smith
introduced the method of drawing on the slate board, and having students
(mainly boys at the time) copy it over and over again. This was preparing them
for industry design which at the time Smith felt needed to be domesticated
due to the high price of importing. I also learned in my methods course
that mimicking is a necessary step students take in art development, which
is interesting because Smith and others of his time believed that the mind was
a muscle that "needed to be repetitively exercised". After
reading the interview article I again confirmed that this technology made its
impact in other ways by allowing the teacher to teach to the class as a group
instead of walking around to each
student individually. Students were now actively taking a role
in the construction of their education versus passively receiving the information relayed by the teacher. The negative
impact of this, which Grace's grandmother agreed with, was the closeness to
which education resembled the factory. I was appalled that her
supervisor actually said schooling needs to display the "efficiency of an
assembly line." This eliminates the purpose of (modern) art which is to
express one's self and creativity. (I say modern because art was originally
used to document events, important people, and such.)
A controversial technology
developed and implemented during this time period in formalized schooling were
motion pictures/"commercials" (Channel
One). I believe their impact on art was more of a undesirable
one due to the fact art was being used as propaganda, but I will provide both the
good and the bad impacts the introduction of film to the classroom had. First I
believe it’s important to consider these few things which I learned through the
Chapter 2 readings- Common schools were created in effort to create a cohesive
body of democratic citizens. This was seen as a need due to the influx of
immigrants. But there was a problem; the issues with the common school
were that most were only one classroom, which meant a high and diverse
population of students, most of which were ESL students. This is where I see
motion pictures as a positive addition to education at that time. Teachers who
couldn't communicate with their ESL students could rely on the motion pictures
(the instructional films) to communicate visually to the students. These
videos commonly embedded values, lessons and even encouraged patriotism.
These videos would have also benefited the English speaking students with
limited literacy.
The issue to bringing these films into
schools was the concern of their educational value. Grace's grandmother brought
up the controversial debate of Channel
One, which was a program played every morning- it was 12 minutes long, 2
minutes of which were commercials. You may wonder how this was even
allowed..Basically, technology was wanted in schools, but it was expensive.
Administration signed contracts which got them free equipment at the
expense of the students being exposed to 2 minutes
of commercials every day. This left teachers with the responsibility to
teach students to become critical viewers and how to detect propaganda in media.
Two views I saw as interesting and relating to this issue
were cultural criticism
and protectionism. Cultural criticism is something
I believe I can relate to today through the
commercials, advertisements and TV shows which definitely
promote oppressive ideologies and stereotypes. This overlaps with
protectionism in where it seeks censorship over harmful technologies and their
content- Cultural criticism actually fights against schools from giving
companies advertising rights and protectionism fears that technologies can
exert heavy influences upon users (especially young ones). To me these
perspectives go hand in hand. Being that students are exposed when they are so
young to these technologies it is important to start educating them about this
manipulation as soon as technology becomes a part of their life. This use of
film today is not so different from the use it had over 100 years ago. We still
see films that instill certain values and morals in people, advertising still
targets audiences, and there are definitely instructional videos still being
made but today we call them tutorials. An example that comes to mind is the
commonly known Joe Camel ads, that we don't see today due to some sort of
regulations or lawsuit I'm sure. Cartoon characters, bright vibrant colors and
other factors are regularly used in advertisements that are meant to attract
the youth. Teachers today are no different from the way they were in the sense
that it is still our responsibility to teach students to detect, analyze and be
critical users of technologies to avoid being targets of marketing and
propaganda.
Ultimately the success or failure of
technology in a classroom does depend on the teacher. I think it’s important to
consider that when using technology you need to make sure your students comprehend
the information. Sometimes there are technologies that are more 'fun' and less
educational (such as the Oregon Trail- which I really, really liked to play but
I can't seem to remember if what I learned was more educational versus fun).
Something future administration needs to consider is how to keep future
teachers on track with technology. Being that I will be considered a
"digital native," I can use my knowledge to help my students become
responsible users of technology and I will be able to use the technology in my
classroom efficiently, but it is still necessary for me to keep up to date with
the latest thing. This is where administration should have workshops on the
newest developments. Just like my previous blog, I think it's important to gauge
where students' views on technology are and use them to help push them towards
the responsible users we should all try to be.
On a final note I thought it was a great
idea (stated in the interview) to have the students review a McDonald's
commercial and look for persuasion techniques- my idea of a positive use of
current media.
Great blog post, full of insight and interesting points. The chalk board is most definitely one of the most important elements of art education, because art is one of those classes where you learn best by watching the teacher. Most times, teacher's don't really participate in class activities, but I feel like in art they almost always do. I had a poetry class in high school, and the teacher always wrote poems when he assigned us to, and he always read aloud his work when he asked us to. I think I saw this teacher as the most human, and the most influential teacher I had. His demonstrations not only showed what the poetry should sound like and the form it should be in, but it was a lot easier to speak in public after he had demonstrated how easy going it could be. In class where you have to give a presentation, it's a lot harder to get up there if the situation is rigid. Likewise, I can see it being a lot easier learning art fundamentals if the teacher demonstrates first and has the students follow along. Like my poetry experience, this would show the way that the teacher wants it to be the closest to. This way, the student knows the basic idea of what their design should be, and follow closest to that.
ReplyDeleteIn the modern age, the teacher's ability to project images onto the chalk board has probably improved the chalk board's ability tenfold. Granted, these images can be shown on a screen or wall, but on a chalk board, the teacher can sort of manipulate the image by circling, high lighting, or putting direct lines with notes on it.
You bring up an interesting point, with teachers demonstrating or participating in the activities they expect from their students. I find that in most of my art classes teachers show us their work, yet in my concentration (painting) I have yet to see my teachers works. I feel it would relieve me of some stress to just know what the teacher has experienced and gone through with their struggles so I can relate. I do find that in most of my classes teachers will participate and it truly helps, as you said, and shows me that if they can do it on the spot- then why can't I? I think it's important to consider and be aware of this as teachers..especially for those of us in elementary levels. Kids like to see that what we assign them isn't unrealistic and impossible. Thanks for the insightful feedback!
DeleteLiana, I have found throughout this assignment that it is in some ways easier to catch the underlying messages in vintage films and advertisements than it is in modern ones. The still you chose from the "Etiquette" film is a perfect example of gender, class, and social expectations. I looked at many, many, WPA propaganda posters and print ads from this time period and it gave me an unexpectedly clear understanding of what was going on in America concerning the war, gender roles, and race. Some of the vintage ads and propaganda are so blatantly biased they would never be tolerated today, which shows that change is indeed occurring. I think it would be compelling to plan a unit around some of these ideas, past and present, so that our students can develop the tools they need to "read" the underlying messages in media today.
ReplyDeleteLiana, I completely agree with what you said! It is funny that we both chose the chalkboard as the most influential technology in our content areas; however, our content areas are different. I found the background information you gave of Walter Smith and his method of utilizing the slate board in class for art very interesting. The chalkboard did change the dynamics of the class because it gave teachers the opportunity to teach a class together and as a whole, rather than individually. The only issue with this is that not every student gets the attention and help where needed.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I chose the television as another important technology from 1900 to 1990. You brought up a very good point about using TV for the benefit of ESL students. That never even crossed my mind when I was writing my blog! Students who do not speak fluent English can definitely use videos as clues to better understanding the English language. I agree that teachers can utilize this technology as a way to communicate with their students. As you mentioned, and I mentioned, the success or failure of technology in the classroom depends on the teacher.
Liana, interesting photo. Can you help me understand where the technology is and how it relates to schooling?
ReplyDeleteI know it's past due but to better illustrate my idea and to answer your question I attempted to provide a post clarifying my ideas!
DeleteThe technology is film, I should have found a photo that zooms out so you can see this is on a TV. I relate it to schooling since they commonly played 'instructional' films and films which would influence students to act and talk certain ways, to adopt certain ideas and behaviors and to become 'model' citizens.
ReplyDelete